Tuition policy rejected by Ontario court


Earlier this week, the Ontario government announcement he will not appeal a court ruling in August confirming Premier Doug Ford’s Student Choice Initiative (SCI).

Jill Dunlop, spokesperson and Minister of Colleges and Universities, revealed that the province is not interested in seeking a legal battle in Canada’s highest court over post-secondary tuition fees.

In the past, the policy was detrimental to the development of student groups and prevented campus communities from accessing many resources, including student union services.

Bethany Osborne, director of communications at the Ontario Ministry of Colleges and Universities, said in a public email: sector. “

In its decision, the Court of Appeal concluded that the contestation with legislation governing Ontario colleges and universities.

In 2019, Ontario Premier Doug Ford implemented a controversial policy, known as SCI, which would allow students to opt out of incidentals or those deemed “”not essential.However, this decision resulted in significant funding losses for student groups and unions.

For example, Ryerson University was impacted through politics, as their student union, equity centers, campus radio station and newspaper have experienced significant budget cuts. In comparison, the University of Ottawa suffered a significant loss of approximately $155,000 in the financing of student life and organization.

University, The U of T tri-campus newspaper had an average membership rate of almost 75%, compared to other U of T initiatives which averaged 78% in 2019. The Editor-in-Chief newspaper revealed in an interview with Vice Magazine that some student unions have been forced to cut mental health coverage in light of budget cuts.

On August 4, the Ontario Court of Appeal issued a unanimous decision upholding a Divisional Court ruling which declared SCI as “illicit‘—Rejecting Ford’s attempt to re-establish the police.

The court upheld this decision and ordered the government to compensate the Canadian Federation of Students for $ 20,000 in costs.

Canadian lawyer and jurist, Justice Grant Huscroft, writing in a statement, “indeed, given the role played by student associations in the governance of universities, the framework constitutes a deep interference in the autonomy of universities, and not a simple obstacle to the discretionary power of universities, as argued The Minister “.

The opt-out provisions that were passed in 2019 created challenges for several organizations on campus as they funded them and deprived them of adequate resources needed to serve students.

A third-year student at the University of Toronto Mississauga, who has chosen to remain anonymous, says The way in an email interview, “I’ve always thought of college as a place where the greatest self-discovery happens, but when groups lose funding, I feel like students lose money. opportunity to express themselves and forge the connections people seek at university. ”

Funding for student groups affects not only the associations themselves, but also the communities they support. The decision to abandon Ford’s policy will benefit many students and provide them with the resources they need to be successful in college.

Editor-in-Chief (Volume 48) | [email protected]
Entering her third year, May is currently completing a double major in Sociology and Criminology. Prior to becoming editor, May contributed for two years to The Medium as editor and associate editor. One of her biggest goals is to start a non-profit organization that responds to humanitarian crises around the world and supports children living in third world countries. When not writing or studying, May spends her time working with dog trainers to provide supervised fun for the four-legged friends at Dogtopia Applewood.

Source link


Comments are closed.